|
Workers’
Compensation for NM Farms and Ranches an Unsettled Issue |
|
Al Berryman and Tim Query |
|
Whether or not to mandate workers’
compensation coverage for farm and ranch workers has been an issue that has
been brought to the attention of the New Mexico state legislature by various
stakeholders. Recently, the issue made its way into the legal system in New
Mexico, as two injured farm workers, along with two worker organizations, are
suing to make the farm and ranch workers exclusion declared unconstitutional
under the equal protection clause of the state constitution. The plaintiffs
decided to sue the Workers Compensation administrator and its director. These
agricultural workers are demanding farm and ranch workers be included in
workers compensation coverage. Currently, farm and ranch employers can
voluntarily cover their laborers under workers’ compensation. Some producers
choose to pay out-of-pocket for worker’s medical bill if injured, or cover them
under liability insurance, which will only pay if the producer is legally
liable.
Workers’ Compensation is a “no fault
system” in which the negligence of neither employee nor employer is considered.
An employer gives up his due process rights and is subject to liability for
injuries to his employees even if he was not in any way responsible for the
injury. Employees are entitled to benefits even if they were responsible for
the accident. In return, employees give up their right to sue the employer for
injuries sustained in the course of employment.
From a public policy viewpoint, this
system makes a great deal of sense for both the worker and the employer.
Consider what happens when an employee is injured on the job. There are
basically four ways in which society could address the problem. First, the
worker could be at the mercy of his friends, family and own resources. Second,
the worker could sue his employer and hope for a favorable outcome despite the
delay and expense of using the courts. Third, the worker could be assisted
through government assistance or welfare. Fourth, the worker could be entitled
to prompt benefits for medical expenses and lost income using workers’
compensation.
The state Workers’ Compensation Act
requires employers with three or more workers to provide workers’ compensation
benefits – except for farm and ranch laborers, private domestic servants and
real estate agents. All employers in the construction industry, regardless of
size, must provide workers’ compensation coverage. Workers’ compensation in New
Mexico includes comprehensive medical benefits (unlimited with no deductibles
or copayments), disability benefits, lifetime benefits
for those who qualify, and limited death benefits for survivors (2/3 of the
deceased employee’s wages for 700 weeks).
Workers Compensation
Coverage in Other States
Various states, including New Mexico,
have grappled with the complexities of workers’ compensation coverage for the
Farm and Ranch industry, and approaches to these complexities have varied. Agricultural
and livestock operations range from the family farm to large corporate-owned
businesses. Commodity-related payments, conversation payments, and other farm
bills face a multifaceted group of agricultural stakeholders. A similar
challenge faces workers’ compensation statutes for these industries, as states
wrestle with the most equitable process for regulating farms and ranches.
Currently,
33 states require workers’ compensation for farm workers, although some state
exempt small farms and part-time employees. In the southwest, California,
Colorado and Arizona require mandatory coverage for all farm workers. Utah
requires coverage for workers on farms with more than $50,000 in payroll. Texas
doesn’t require mandatory workers’ compensation for any industry, including
farms and ranches. However, employers who are not required
to carry workers’ compensation may elect to provide coverage on a voluntary
basis.
Farm and ranch owners claim that
agriculture is unique because the industry is comprised of mostly small,
family-owned businesses that have little control over prices for the
commodities that they produce. They claim that requiring them to carry workers
compensation will hurt the state economy. Proponents of including agriculture
workers believe that they should be treated the same as other employees and
that other states with large agricultural segments, such as California and
Arizona, have proven that it is not detrimental to a state’s economy. They
claim that employers who do not provide care for injured workers pass these
costs onto the rest of society. They also point to the state constitution and
claim that the current law deprives them of equal rights.
No person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law; nor shall any person be denied equal protection of the laws. Equality of rights under law shall not be denied on account of the sex of any person. (As amended November 7, 1972, effective July 1, 1973.)
Factors Driving the Issue
Some
of the factors that differentiate farms and ranches from other types of
production are now discussed.
The
Diversity of the Farm. One characteristic
that differentiates American farming from other industries is their wide range
of sizes, ownership structures, and business types. Ninety-eight percent of
farms are family farms, and they account for 85 percent of farm production. However,
the recent trend has been a consolidation of farms and ranches into larger
operations, including large corporations. There are various reasons for this
trend, such as some younger family members choosing not to follow into the
family business, increasingly larger amounts of capital required to be
competitive, and economies of scale.
Most farms in New Mexico are small.
According to the 2007 Census of Agriculture, there are 20,930 farms in New
Mexico. Only 1,973 of these farms have three or more hired workers, and
therefore would be required to carry workers compensation. These larger
operations had 19,142 employees.
Agriculture
Safety. Agriculture is among the most dangerous
industries. Agricultural workers comprise 3 percent of the nation’s workforce,
but incur 14 percent of work-related deaths. Farming is one of the few
industries in which the families (who often share the work and live on site)
are at risk for fatal and nonfatal injuries. Fatal injuries constitute a
significant burden on the agricultural sector, as indicated by the annual
average of 806 fatal occupational injuries from 1992 to 2002. During this
period, fatal occupational injury rates in the agricultural sector, though
decreasing, averaged more than four times the rate for the private sector (U.S.
Department of Labor). There is also a dichotomy in the age of agricultural
workers, which appears to affect safety rates; compared to all industries,
agriculture employed proportionately more workers aged 16–19 (7.2% versus 5.1%)
and workers aged 55 and older (22.9% versus 13.6%).
Migrant
Workers. Migrant workers are also an important
component of farm employment. There are numerous categories that encompass
these workers as well. During 1999, 84 percent of farm workers were foreign
born, 53 percent lacked legal documentation. and 49
percent were “settled” or residing within 75 miles of their farm work job. The
rest were migrant workers to varying degrees: 22 percent were newcomers who had
entered the United States to work on farms and ranches during the past year; 21
percent were shuttle migrants, in that they have a residence in the United
States but commute to work at a distance; and 8 percent were follow-the-crop
migrants who perform farm work in more than one location and must relocate for
employment.
Foreign-born workers also have an impact
on accident and fatality rates. Latino workers generally experience the highest
rate of fatal injuries on the job: 25 percent more than whites, 61 percent more
than blacks, and more than double the rate for Asians. Latino workers
experience the highest rate of non-fatal injuries on the job as well: 46% more
than whites, 34% more than blacks, and 150% the rate for Asians. There are many
factors behind these figures, including a higher proportion of Latino workers
in more dangerous occupations—such as construction, food processing,
landscaping, and agriculture—as well as communication difficulties where
English is not the native language.
Other factors that affect the
implementation of mandatory workers compensation for farms and ranches in New
Mexico are addressed below.
Additional
Enforcement Resources. The Workers
Compensation Administration (WCA) is responsible for enforcing the requirements
of Workers Compensation law in New Mexico. The addition of roughly 15,700
employers would require new enforcement resources.
Family
Members. It is very common for family members to
work on their family’s farm and ranch. If Workers Compensation coverage were
required, then it might be necessary to clarify that family members do not
require coverage. In addition family members should not be counted as employees
for purposes of determining the number of employees.
Mutual
Assistance. It is a common practice for ranch
owners to assist their friends and neighbors; for example, through group
roundups. It should be clarified that these are not employees unless they are
being paid.
Contracted
Labor.
Farm
owners sometimes use farm contractors the same way that other businesses use
temporary help services. If workers’ compensation coverage were required, then
it would apply to labor contractors.
Cost of Workers’
Compensation
Workers’ Compensation in New Mexico is
provided by the private sector and there is no state compensation company. The
number of insurance companies writing workers’ compensation coverage in New
Mexico in 2007 was 199. The market place is competitive.
Rates for workers’ compensation are
subject to approval by the Department of Insurance. Premiums vary according to
the safety record of the employer and the underwriting rules of a particular
insurance company. Businesses that are unable to obtain coverage in the normal
marketplace are able to purchase coverage through the New Mexico Assigned Risk
Plan. All employers are eligible for coverage through this facility.
A sample of assigned risk workers’
compensation rates per $100 of payroll is included in the table. These rates
range from a low of $4.95 for animal raising to a high
of $18.53 for livestock raising. The table also includes rates for one
insurance company. Actual rates will vary by employer experience. The assigned
risk rates are the highest that an employer could pay. These rates are
comparable to those in the construction industry.
As
an example, a dairy with a payroll of $1,000,000 would pay roughly $74,900 in
the assigned risk plan and $48,300 with New Mexico Mutual Company. A cattle
ranch with a payroll of $50,000 would pay roughly $9,265 in the assigned risk
plan and $6,390 with New Mexico Mutual Company. The pricing of workers’
compensation in New Mexico provides strong incentives for safety by giving
lower premiums for companies with fewer claims.
Conclusion
The costs of requiring farms and
ranches with three or more employees to carry workers’ compensation would
affect roughly 2,000 farms and ranches in New Mexico. The costs for workers
compensation, although significant, are similar to other industries. Most
states currently require coverage. As the legislature has not acted on this
concern, it will be up to the courts to decide the issue.



